senator(both times controlled by libs when mitt romney was gov) but now its ok? libs just passed it,oh now there is a lib governor,so its ok now right? i bet the liberal media doesent say a word about the dems turning this down twice,they will just report it passed
They’re a bunch of hypocrites.
Unfortunately, they make the laws.
Vote the SOBs out!
2 Responses to “why did Massachusetts,in 2004 and 2006,vote down an amendment to allow the governor to appoint an interim?”
Leave a Reply
senator(both times controlled by libs when mitt romney was gov) but now its ok? libs just passed it,oh now there is a lib governor,so its ok now right? i bet the liberal media doesent say a word about the dems turning this down twice,they will just report it passed
They’re a bunch of hypocrites.
Unfortunately, they make the laws.
Vote the SOBs out!
2 Responses to “why did Massachusetts,in 2004 and 2006,vote down an amendment to allow the governor to appoint an interim?”
-
Spock (rhp) on October 4th, 2009 at 10:07 pm
libs are hypocrites. or else they’re simply showing their true colors and cramming their political power down the people’s throats.
References : -
William K on October 4th, 2009 at 10:50 pm
They’re a bunch of hypocrites.
Unfortunately, they make the laws.
Vote the SOBs out!
References :
libs are hypocrites. or else they’re simply showing their true colors and cramming their political power down the people’s throats.
References :
They’re a bunch of hypocrites.
Unfortunately, they make the laws.
Vote the SOBs out!
References :